0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ç¹«Á÷ ±Ù·ÎÀÚÀÇ »çȸ½É¸®Àû ¾÷¹«È¯°æ°ú ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨ÀÌ Á¤½Å°Ç°­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of Psychosocial Work Environment and Self-efficacy on Mental Health of Office Workers

Çѱ¹Á÷¾÷°Ç°­°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2013³â 22±Ç 3È£ p.228 ~ 239
KMID : 1003720130220030228
Àü°æÀÚ ( June Kyung-Ja ) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

ÃÖÀº¼÷ ( Choi Eun-Sook ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Ú¹ÌÁø ( Park Mi-Jin ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç´ëÇпø »ê¾÷ȯ°æº¸°Ç¿¬±¸½Ç

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the effects of psychosocial work environment and self-efficacy on stress, depression, and burn-out among office workers.

Methods: Survey data were collected from 331 office workers who worked in one workplace from April 10 to 30, 2012. The impact of psychosocial work environment and self-efficacy on stress, depression, and burn-out was analyzed with hierarchical multiple regression using SAS version 9.3.

Results: Work-family conflicts and emotional demands were identified as main factors influencing mental health. Other work environment factors influencing mental health were role clarity for stress, possibilities for development, meaning-of work, social support-from supervisors and job insecurity for depression, and social community at work for burn-out. Self-efficacy was correlated with most psychosocial work environment and factor with independent influence on stress and depression. The final models including general characteristics, psychosocial work environment, and self-efficacy accounted for 34%, 44%, and 36% for stress, depression, and burn-out respectively.

Conclusion: To promote mental health in office workers, there is a need to decrease work-family conflicts and emotional demands and to improve work organization and job contents, social support, and self-efficacy.
KeyWords
»çȸ½É¸®Àû ¾÷¹«È¯°æ, ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨, ½ºÆ®·¹½º, ¿ì¿ï, ¼ÒÁø
Psychosocial work environment, Self-efficacy, Stress, Depression, Burn-out
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)